Coward&Wicked Islamic Pakistan want turn Delhi-Mumbai in2Hiroshima-Nagasaki
Jump to Page:
< Previous [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Next >
Location: Brampton, Ont, Canada
Posted on: 12-08-15 11:50:19
Quote:
Originally posted by ramar2005
We are not taking this threat seriously, but still are pursuing people to people contact, cricket and hockey diplomacy. we already have lost all but traces of our civilization in India before 1000 A.D. But are still following waiting at the gate policy. History may repeat itself.
http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report-isis-plans-to-take-over-india-by-2020-shows-group-s-map-2112936?ref=yfp
Who said we are not taking this threat seriously ? - Do you know why Modi Bring Ajit Doval as NSA ? - do some research on Doval and you will know.
India is not strong as West or Israel ( back by USA) - If you noticed Modi govt has been working with neighbors to make strong tie up - first fix the borders strong then they can plan further steps to control PAK ( by soft and hard )
Yes, we all want Modi to act ASAP - not gonna happen , these are complex issue it needs time and planning
-----------------------------------------------------------------
'Some goals are so worthy, it's glorious even to fail.' (Param Vir Chakra awardee Lt. Manoj Pandey)
Quote:
Originally posted by mcg7
Pakistan was our territory and will be again in future -
While I appreciate your passion, I highly doubt this will happen. Don't get worked up unnecessarily. India is growing, and ignoring Pakistan is in its best interests - on and off field. However, having peace with and within the neighborhood is always in any Nation's interest. I again doubt this will happen due to Pakistan Army's ongoing support to their so-called 'good' terrorists, which will never diminish. Hence, in my opinion, ignoring this rogue nation on all International platform is the only need of an hour. India is growing in leaps and bounds. Don't even care about them.
Location: Brampton, Ont, Canada
Posted on: 13-08-15 09:32:15
No We don't need fully Pakistan - we have already more than 20% minority , trust me you don't want to add more ( unless you want to live under Sharia Law 
)
The best option is :
- make strong tie with neighbours ( nepal, bangla, afghan, myanmar , burma, sri lanka- working good)
- isolate PAK in international community (foreign policy so far working good)
- support their separatist movement and break them in parts then indirectly control them( especially baloch) - We don't need to hit them hard otherwise we risk nuclear - trust me we don't need this.
Yes we like to be proud ourself and show our power - but sometime its good to be patience and smart
we always use one joke which apply to us right now (its about Rajputs falls pride) - We all know the strength and pride Rajputs carry - they were strong at one point but because of their stupidity british ruled us for many years
- Rajputs pride were so high that they were ready to die for silly things ( example: Brits came with guns and rajput ran openly toward them with their swords not knowing that brits don't needs balls they just need to pull the trigger - that is stupidity - while Sivaji was very smart - he used tactics to beat brits....
-----------------------------------------------------------------
'Some goals are so worthy, it's glorious even to fail.' (Param Vir Chakra awardee Lt. Manoj Pandey)
On the contrary besides the Sikhs , Rajputs were the only community able to with stand the invaders for a long time and give them a hard time .
The same thing could be said by any and every war soldier who dies .
Funny thing how people who have done little can joke on people who have laid down / sacrificed their lives.
BTW by the time Britishers came India was already under centuries of Mughal rule ... not sure where you got the Rajputs with their swords and Brits with their guns analogy from ??
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fido.
Quote:
Originally posted by Blue_Peafowl
- Rajputs pride were so high that they were ready to die for silly things ( example: Brits came with guns and rajput ran openly toward them with their swords not knowing that brits don't needs balls they just need to pull the trigger
Long time since schooldays to remember history. But as far i could recollect, it was Robert Clive and India after Aurangazeb who died around 1708. There was no strong Mughal ruler in Delhi. There was a succession war in the South for Arcot Nawab throne, between Prince Muhammad Ali and his uncle Chanda Saheb. The British sided with the former as decided by Clive and the French with Chanda Saheb. The British side won the succession war. Simlarly, the British under Clive defeated Nawab Siraj ud Daula of Bengal though the latter's army vastly outnumbered the British, because of the original "Mir Jafar".
Vir Shivaji's reign unfortunately ended in 1679 much before Aurangazeb's death.
Rajputs best times might have ended before Mohammed Ghori's invasion as early as 1190. They did not join Prithviraj Chauhan to fight the muslim invaders in the Battle of Terrain. Otherwise, India might not have had sultanate and mughal rule for 600 years. But even now we have not learnt our lessons.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Location: Brampton, Ont, Canada
Posted on: 14-08-15 09:18:55
Quote:
Originally posted by Fido
On the contrary besides the Sikhs , Rajputs were the only community able to with stand the invaders for a long time and give them a hard time .
The same thing could be said by any and every war soldier who dies .
Funny thing how people who have done little can joke on people who have laid down / sacrificed their lives.
BTW by the time Britishers came India was already under centuries of Mughal rule ... not sure where you got the Rajputs with their swords and Brits with their guns analogy from ??
Arre yaar i m not making joke of Rajput - They were and are still a warrior - i was just referring to stupid pride we indian have - there was enemy with guns and we go against him on open ground with swords -
Yes Rajaputana was strong , they were warriors but history shows that they were so egoistic or too much into pride that they lost many battles
-----------------------------------------------------------------
'Some goals are so worthy, it's glorious even to fail.' (Param Vir Chakra awardee Lt. Manoj Pandey)
Quote:
Originally posted by Blue_Peafowl
there was enemy with guns and we go against him on open ground with swords -
Yes Rajaputana was strong , they were warriors but history shows that they were so egoistic or too much into pride that they lost many battles
Where were the Rajputs when Britishers came along ???? India was already under a Mughal rule for centuries by then .. Please help me conceive of a scenario of Rajputs with swords and Brits with guns ...
There's a very fine line between self respect and ego and its hard to find where one stops and the other starts .... Maharana Pratap , Prithviraj Chauhan are the same people who gave the Mughals the toughest of times as opposed to other areas in India where Mughals had a relatively easier effort to sweep across ...
In my opinion and for what they did , Rajputs were a clan to be proud of and as much as Sikhs a martial clan .
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fido.
