Posted on: 20-10-14 16:14:27
Read my whole post, if you please will. All your answers are in there.
Kashmir is following sufi and shia islam, diamterically opposite to the wahabi sunni islam of pakistan. The Pak Occupied Kashmir is living in stone age, hardly any economic development and their Kashmiris under terror of the Punjabi sunni muslim Pak army. If India's Kashmir is given to Pakistan, Kashmiris will simply become canon fodder for the Pak military. Pak wants only Kashmir and not Kashmiris.
The truth is China and Pakistan are destroying the Himalayas by their belligerent approach in claiming territories which are not their own. Fifty years from now the problem will become one of ecology.
China has two disciples who will run to its beck and call. One is North Korea and the other is Pakistan. Both these disciples are notorious for threatening their neighbours with their nuclear toys and specially Pakistan for creating and nurturing terrorism.
If the United Nations of the world have the courage to stare this triumvirate rogue nations in their face and ask them to stop their nuclear blackmail, we may have peace not only for Kashmir, also for the entire planet.
Until then, India threatened by a theocratic Pakistan and a dictatorial communist China has no option but to guard its borders.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally posted by Nightmare
The problem with morons like you, who have studied in English and have good command over language but have stunted mind, is that you are good at putting in words your fantasy.
NM - It has been pointed out to you repeatedly that you need to tone down your name-calling and rhetoric while you're making your point. You may think that this "tough" language makes you seem badass, but in fact, it comes across as amateurish and juvenile, diluting any valid points you may be making.
What will it take for you to get your point across without the name calling?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Are you there?
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueLobster
Quote:
Originally posted by Nightmare
The problem with morons like you, who have studied in English and have good command over language but have stunted mind, is that you are good at putting in words your fantasy.
NM - It has been pointed out to you repeatedly that you need to tone down your name-calling and rhetoric while you're making your point. You may think that this "tough" language makes you seem badass, but in fact, it comes across as amateurish and juvenile, diluting any valid points you may be making.
What will it take for you to get your point across without the name calling?
I did say that my English is quite poor. Please let me know some alternate word to describe a person who is advocating that Kashmir should secede.
I use those kind of "rhetoric" when I find that the person is lying or distorting facts.
Anyway, I guess you will have problem with my most other altrnates like "Obtuse". I would better not post anything.
Kashmir is definitely better off with India than Pakistan or being independent.
If Pakis were not sending and training terrorist over there, they would live peacefully with India.
They are not suffering because of the Indian security forces , but due to the climate of terrorism created by the Pakis. If the Pakis were not there , the security forces wouldn't be required and Kashmir would be just like any other normal Indian state.
Muslims live in harmony in other Indian states , they would do the same in Kashmir if not for the Paki meddling.
In fact Hindu Pandits have suffered more in Kashmir than anyone else, no one talks about that.
Quote:
who have studied in English and have good command over language
Thanks for acknowledging that. However, regret to burst your bubble, but I studied in 'Pukka Hindi' medium.
Quote:
Originally posted by Nightmare
I use those kind of "rhetoric" when I find that the person is lying or distorting facts.
Who gets to decide what the 'facts' are? Rather call them your perspective against the other.
Facts are often skewed and a loose interpretation of one's own biases; and school of thought to which they are subscribed to.
