Posts: 938
Location: Brampton
Posted on: 08-05-14 21:42:19
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueLobster
I assume you know how to use google, right? Here are the keywords. Search
1. Corrupt IAS Officers
2. ex-IIT arrested
And then play around with other keywords, you'll get all the proof you want that going to an IIT or becoming an IAS officer is no guarantee of brilliance or competence.
I can't really explain any further if you can't understand this.
Are you talking about corrupt or about competent/brilliant?
If you google ‘Corrupt Indian Politicians’ or ‘criminal indian politicians’, you will get more hits than corrupt IAS officers.
Now you need to understand it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A Delhite in Toronto
Posts: 5286
Location: Canada
Posted on: 09-05-14 18:07:28
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueLobster
Quote:
Originally posted by Fido
Calling an IIT ian or an IAS / IRS Officer incompetent is basically calling the selection and processing criterion of these institutions incompetent .... And these Institutions have proven themselves historically by turning out brilliant and intelligent people over and over again .. and are respected for the quality they produce.
It is like saying an AIIMS graduated doctor is incompetent .... only a non rational person or a person who is not aware of these institutions would say that .
I assume you know how to use google, right? Here are the keywords. Search
1. Corrupt IAS Officers
2. ex-IIT arrested
And then play around with other keywords, you'll get all the proof you want that going to an IIT or becoming an IAS officer is no guarantee of brilliance or competence.
I can't really explain any further if you can't understand this.
Do you know the difference between competent / brilliant and corrupt / criminal ?? Or are you trying to substitute one with other to prove your point in vain
Look at how you mis play with your words when you cannot prove your point ...
I bet you started googling incompetent IIT / IAS Officers and when nothing came up , you started googling corrupt IIT / IAS Officers ..
Have you ever taken the IIT exam and if yes did you qualify ?? Now imagine the brilliance of those who must have cracked it and cracked the IAS exam also in first attempt ??
Or do you know some ex IIT ians and IAS / IRS Officers and do you not find them to be brilliant or competent ? ..... I find it ridiculous that some one can question to competence and brilliance of top of the top Indian Institutions which have the highest standards of selection .....
Please stick to your point of incompetence of IIT / IAS Officers and the provide examples .... Decide whether you are trying to say that Kejariwal is incompetent or Kejariwal is corrupt and then take it on from there to prove your point ..You started with incompetence and ended in corruption ..and neither of them applies to Kejariwal ...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fido.
Posts: 5286
Location: Canada
Posted on: 09-05-14 18:20:05
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueLobster
Kejriwal has not proven anything except the ability to rile up people against corruption. On the shoulders of Anna Hazare, nobody had heard of him prior to that. Nothing wrong with that, but in terms of governance he has shown his incompetence.
What ??? You surprise me ... you are so fond of googling ..Google Magasay Award Kejariwal and let us know what you find .... Please tell us what did he get it for ... and tell us whether it was worthless ...
OK so he joined Anna Hazare so what .... What did Anna Hazare achievewith his anti corruption stir ??
Kejariwal is the one who shot off, took the gauntlet thrown by Kapil Sibal to enter politics if he wants to change the system..... and proved himself by winning 20 seats in his maiden election ... and then with in 49 days proved effective corruption free Governance of Delhi State .... Fought with the Centre against a corrupt high handed Delhi Police .... With his measures such as anti corruption telephone lines , public meetings , refusing security from the MHA , driving his own car to office .... he set standards for politicians and sent them scurrying .....
Did you know that NM started chai pe charcha based on AK s public meetings and BJP CM in MP started copying his corruption lines.
Did you know that he promised & delivered 700 lts free water to households and lowered the power bills of consumers ?
Did you know that he arranged for audit of Power Companies with the CAG ...
Did you know that people were afraid of asking for bribe @ Delhi Municipality during his tenure ?
These are just some of the examples and one has to be either blind or unaware to call such a man incompetent .... or may be not understanding the meaning of that word ....
This is stuff what revolutionaries and game changers are made of ...With in such a short span he created a whirl wind in Indian Politics and set new standards for Politics and Governance ...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fido.
Posts: 5286
Location: Canada
Posted on: 09-05-14 18:27:01
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueLobster
Quote:
In stead NM has his hands in blood and the strongest track record to prove his communalist stance which aligns that of the BJP and the RSS .... Fortunately neither has AAP made religion a primary agenda nor do they have their hands in blood ..... Thousand times better on that !!
If NM has blood on his hands, he would've been convicted of a crime. In a democracy, you're innocent until proven guilty. Didn't you say the same thing about Somnath Bharti in an earlier post?
What ???? Are you trying to say the Narendra Modi does not have blood on his hands ??
Are you trying to say that Modi did not use excesses during 2002 riots to kill Muslims in encounters and used the Government machinery to execute them ??
The whole world knows it ... Please let us know whether you know that this is true or not ??
Courts run on evidence and in a corrupt Indian system evidence and witness are brought and sold ..... but that does not change the fact ....
I would love to hear from you that Modi did not commit illegal excesses and did not abuse power & Government machinery in subduing Muslims ....
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fido.
Posts: 3252
Location:
Posted on: 09-05-14 19:19:14
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueLobster
If NM has blood on his hands, he would've been convicted of a crime. In a democracy, you're innocent until proven guilty. Didn't you say the same thing about Somnath Bharti in an earlier post?
By this standard, the entire Congress is innocent of Sikhs' masaccre in 1984. Not one got implicated and sentensed. Doesn't meant a darn. The whole Delhi knows who was behind the mob attacks - Sajjan Kumar and Tytler.
Why then BJP makes hue and cry over Congress machinery involved in 1984?
Why Muslims are still displaced and can't return to their homes that were destroyed in Gujarat riots.
http://www.firstpost.com/election-diary/graham-staines-to-gulbarg-society-what-modi-doesnt-know-1484801.html
https://news.vice.com/article/narendra-modis-shame-muslim-survivors-of-the-gujarat-riots-are-still-suffering
Why, if Modi talks about the whole Gujarat, the muslims are not rehabilitated and Gujarat Govt. is not ordered to hasten the whole process to provide justice to the displaced families - even if Modi was not behind the whole pogrom?
Why there are no specifics discussed re. Gujarat's develoment/progress that is most talked about and is becoming a cliche? Why, no documentary, no feature on what specific development Gurajat has seen in Modi's tenure?
At least in Kejriwal's case, we have a proven details to what he achieved in those 49 days.
Posts: 938
Location: Brampton
Posted on: 09-05-14 20:51:16
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A Delhite in Toronto
Posts: 348
Location: Brampton
Posted on: 10-05-14 07:24:34
Quote:
Originally posted by Delhite
Watch it out - specially from 3:05.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFZBNUnG5pI" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFZBNUnG5pI
I watched the video and here's what i think :
1) where is the "solid, compelling evidence" that proves that Modi ordered killings? It's one man's word against another man who is not in the video.
2) How do you even verify that the Person talking in the interview is not an actor hired by non-modi conspirators?
3) Another guy will release another 2,000 videos showing AAP or Cong in bad light. what's the big deal?
It is a case of "he said, she said". There are tons of such chupke, chupke videos released during election times for political and personal gains.
sorry, no takers here.