Any help FAQ by high commision during family claqss interview
Jump to Page:
< Previous [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Next >
India343 ... You are confused and making others confused. You are not giving complete information and whatever you are giving it is bits and pieces. First you said wife is sponsoring you. Then you are saying you are already PR holder. There are so many unanswered questions. Take time, narrate all your story from beginning to end .... then ask the questions or have your children contact someone here who can give advise.
dear all
I told you that I was PR holder which got expired in 2009. Till 2009 I visited canada many times also worked there. My all childrens are will settled and 2 of them who are married are citizen and other 2 are also PR. Earlier in 2009 I sponsored my wife and children and now my wife spnosred me in 2014 because I have lost my status as PR. She is my first wife and continuing as my wife since 1980. I do not know what is confusing.
Location: God's own country
Posted on: 11-02-15 04:54:39
Sir,
Now only your are giving complete information. Re read your previous posts (except your last one) and it will make no sense for a person who does not know you.
If your PR expired in 2009, we are now in 2015. Almost 6 years have passed. So your PR is out. Your wife has sponsered you and hence you are invited for an interview.
Now again, there are many unanswered questions :
1. Is your wife's PR current? Why did she nat take citizenship.
2. When did your wife leave Canada? if she has left for more than 3 years and both of you are in Indian for more than 3 years, They may not grant you a PR card. I am assuming that after 2009, you wife was in Canada for atleast 3 or 4 years, otherwise her PR itself might have expired.
Please give more info. to help you, or google and find out information yourself.
Or you may even hire a competent immigration lawyer to help you.
Murali
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I am a Gents and not a Ladies.
Primarily it appears that you are using Canada as a convenience and are not sincere about staying in Canada / making it your home .... I think that s why the interview.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fido.
Quote:
Originally posted by Fido
Primarily it appears that you are using Canada as a convenience and are not sincere about staying in Canada / making it your home .... I think that s why the interview.
It is true ... it would be a tough sell.
