Quote:
Orginally posted by prakask55
Mera bas chale to in leaders & (chamche of western culture) ko chorahe par juton ki mala pahananu.
because of votes politics & personal intrests these criminals abusing hindus in there own country.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I once made a mistake, but I was wrong about it.
It seems people are registering just to respond to this thread. Or maybe they are answering their own questions.....
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I once made a mistake, but I was wrong about it.
Quote:
Orginally posted by crenshaw
http://www.censusindia.net/religiondata/statement.pdf
These numbers would suggest that conversion numbers have been insignificant. Of course, the entire issue is a good political tool for right wingers to mobilize themselves and evidently brings out strong reactions as is evident from this post:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended Services- Servicedomino.com
http://www.servicedomino.com
Hi All
Good morning.
I will provide some point by point rebuttal of the points made by rejoinders by esteemed members. But before I do that, I wish to say that I want Jayaendra Sarawathi to be hanged to death if he is found guilty. Nay, hope he is stoned to death in public for not only has he destroyed a great institution, he has destroyed the very fabric of commonly accepted wisdom.
First the census. We all know that when the census figures in India were recently published, the growth rate of a particular segment was said to be 44 per thousand as against the national average of 21 per thousand. Obviously, right wingers went to town about it. And that became a fodder for the court jesters ( one whose name rhymes with Aloo) and overnight the figures were changed. The segmental growth quoted now stands at 29 for that segment as against the original 44. So much for accuracy of the data.
Second, how far would we like to go? Some of us have spoken about original inhabitants being Dravidians.
Some of the temples of Pallava and Chola dynasty date back to 3rd century BC. Is that enough to link the same to the temples of Modern day Thanjavur? And how did Indonesia adopt Hinduism ( it was Hindu until end 15th Century AD)? Was it also because of the spread of the same by sword….as is being implied in the question?
I think Hindus always have co-opted segments of population. Thus Sakas and Huns have been assimilated in to the very fabric of life and many a present day Rajput/Jat/Bishnoi families will bear the DNA imprints of those nomadic tribes that came to India. The problems have existed where the segments have resisted cooption.
Third
About the threat posed by conversions. I am quoting verbatim from an article whose link is provided below the extract:
The Indian government has failed to protect Hindu Reang tribals in Tripura from being ethnically cleansed by ……….
http://www.rediff.com/news/2002/aug/16rajeev.htm
http://www.rediff.com/news/2001/feb/23rajeev.htm
So much for the benign intentions of the conversions.
Fourth AND THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT
Fun has been poked by some members regarding the impact of my theory of ‘beachhead”. It is actually called logical incrementalism. But that is a different point.
Let us consider for a moment the constitution of the present parliament in New Delhi.
The main segment that changed the ruling government was the number of MPs from Andhra Pradesh. Where did those MPs come from? They came from the support of Naxalites, the very same people who have been now roaming around the greater country side talking of Maoist revolution in India, who have helped terrorists in Kashmir and North East, to smuggle arms across the length and breadth.
And pray how many of them are linked to church? Please read the articles by Ajai Sahni in Outlookindia.com and you would know what I am talking about.
When the fractured polity is New Delhi is dictated to by a motley group of thirty odd MPs, who owe their victory to tacit pre-poll pact, then it becomes clear that we are not talking here of only beachheads and McDonalds but something far more important.
That I hope will be enough food for thought to many esteemed members of the establishment.
My aim is not to provoke a heated round of discussion but just to provoke everyone to think. If I can provoke even ten odd members to think, then I would have succeeded in what I had set out to do.
Thank you.
With regards.
Vp
-----------------------------------------------------------------
vpan
Quote:
Orginally posted by V PANDIT
I will provide some point by point rebuttal of the points made by rejoinders by esteemed members.
snip
First the census. We all know that when the census figures in India were recently published, the growth rate of a particular segment was said to be 44 per thousand as against the national average of 21 per thousand. Obviously, right wingers went to town about it. And that became a fodder for the court jesters ( one whose name rhymes with Aloo) and overnight the figures were changed. The segmental growth quoted now stands at 29 for that segment as against the original 44. So much for accuracy of the data.
Quote:
Orginally posted by V PANDIT
Second, how far would we like to go? Some of us have spoken about original inhabitants being Dravidians.
Quote:
Orginally posted by V PANDIT
Third
About the threat posed by conversions. I am quoting verbatim from an article whose link is provided below the extract:
The Indian government has failed to protect Hindu Reang tribals in Tripura from being ethnically cleansed by ……….
http://www.rediff.com/news/2002/aug/16rajeev.htm
http://www.rediff.com/news/2001/feb/23rajeev.htm
So much for the benign intentions of the conversions.
Quote:
Orginally posted by V PANDIT
Fourth AND THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT
Fun has been poked by some members regarding the impact of my theory of ‘beachhead”. It is actually called logical incrementalism. But that is a different point.
Let us consider for a moment the constitution of the present parliament in New Delhi.
The main segment that changed the ruling government was the number of MPs from Andhra Pradesh. Where did those MPs come from? They came from the support of Naxalites, the very same people who have been now roaming around the greater country side talking of Maoist revolution in India, who have helped terrorists in Kashmir and North East, to smuggle arms across the length and breadth.
And pray how many of them are linked to church? Please read the articles by Ajai Sahni in Outlookindia.com and you would know what I am talking about.
When the fractured polity is New Delhi is dictated to by a motley group of thirty odd MPs, who owe their victory to tacit pre-poll pact, then it becomes clear that we are not talking here of only beachheads and McDonalds but something far more important.
That I hope will be enough food for thought to many esteemed members of the establishment.
Quote:
Orginally posted by V PANDIT
My aim is not to provoke a heated round of discussion but just to provoke everyone to think. If I can provoke even ten odd members to think, then I would have succeeded in what I had set out to do.
Quote:
Orginally posted by crenshaw
Funny how you forget that the BJP had been in power when the exercise was conducted. If there was a legitimate case to challenge the numbers, it would have been in court by now!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended Services- Servicedomino.com
http://www.servicedomino.com
Quote:
Orginally posted by V PANDIT
Second, how far would we like to go? Some of us have spoken about original inhabitants being Dravidians.
Some of the temples of Pallava and Chola dynasty date back to 3rd century BC. Is that enough to link the same to the temples of Modern day Thanjavur? And how did Indonesia adopt Hinduism ( it was Hindu until end 15th Century AD)? Was it also because of the spread of the same by sword….as is being implied in the question?
I think Hindus always have co-opted segments of population. Thus Sakas and Huns have been assimilated in to the very fabric of life and many a present day Rajput/Jat/Bishnoi families will bear the DNA imprints of those nomadic tribes that came to India. The problems have existed where the segments have resisted cooption.
Thank you.
With regards.
Vp
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I once made a mistake, but I was wrong about it.
Advertise Contact Us Privacy Policy and Terms of Usage FAQ Canadian Desi © 2001 Marg eSolutions Site designed, developed and maintained by Marg eSolutions Inc. |