Posted on: 24-04-08 11:26:57
Quote:
Originally posted by puttoo
Quote:
Originally posted by cdn_dude
"unable to hire an american with equal qualification and TEMPORARILY hiring canadian/maxican.The company should try to get an American on the job as fas as possible."
This can be interpreted as the same
"Position in the U.S. requires a NAFTA professional"
Your interpretation is wrong. When there is such a requirement, there is no indirect interpretation like what you have stated. The LC requirement is strictly enforced when such a requirement is there.
The link i was reading at a site, liked to share with CD's regarding proposal of TN to 3 years
http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html
I said "assumption" and not "requirement".
And for that reason the TN holders have to renew the Visa every year. The job letter have to mention that the job is for a year or less. If your job letter does not have any indication about the job period, your application will be deined.
And if you say, yes I like USA, and I am planning to Buy a house in USA and will be staying there for another 15 years, the officer can and will reject you.
My point is TN is a temporary work Visa and the applicant must return to home country and have not itention of making US home.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A Proud Indian Canadian
Quote:
Originally posted by Garvo Gujarati
My point is TN is a temporary work Visa and the applicant must return to home country and have not itention of making US home.
Yes, I agree with this point. What I do not agree is the "assumption" part in your post.
