The Hindu is the worst newspaper in India which has run sustained campaign against India and in favor of Jehadi and China. Sad part is the title of the newspaper which is confused with the Hindu community's view in foreign media. N. Ram , the editor of the newspaper is a thoroughly corrupt person who does not observe any ethics of journalism. I had pointed out this before and I did get a few replies which praised this moron. Following s an interesting letter to the editor exposing The Hindu's duplicity.

This is a Letter to the Editor of The Hindu, from a practising Christian lady who was Professor in Stella Maris College, Chennai till recently; now settled at Baroda, regarding an Edit in The Hindu in favour of bringing back MF Hussain to India

Dear Ram,



I have taken time to write this to you Ram-for the simple reason that we have known you for so many years- you and The Hindu bring back happy memories Please take what I am putting down as those that come from an agonized soul. You know that I do not mince words and what I have to say I will-I call a spade a spade-now it is too late for me to learn the tricks of being called a 'secularist' if that means a bias for, one, and a bias against, another.

Hussain is now a citizen of Qatar-this has generated enough of heat and less of light. Qatar you know better than me is not a country which respects democracy or freedom of expression. Hussain says he has complete freedom-I challenge him to paint a picture of Mohammed fully clad.

There is no second opinion that artists have the Right of Freedom of expression. Is such a right restricted only to Hussain? Will that right not flow to Dan Brown-why was his film-Da Vinci Code not screened? Why was Satanic Verses banned-does Salman Rushdie not have that freedom of expression? Similarly why is Taslima hunted and hounded and why fatwas have been issued on both these writers? Why has Qatar not offered citizenship to Taslima? In the present rioting in Shimoga in Karnataka against the article Taslima wrote against the tradition of burqua which appeared in the Out Look in Jan 2007.No body protested then either in Delhi or in any other part of the country; now when it reappears in a Karnataka paper there is rioting. Is there a political agenda to create a problem in Karnataka by the intolerant goons? Why has the media not condemned this insensitivity and intolerance of the Muslims against Taslima's views? When it comes to the Sangh Parivar it is quick to call them goons and intolerant etc. Now who are the goons and where is this tolerance and sensitivity?

Regarding Hussain's artistic freedom it seems to run unfettered in an expression of sexual perversion only when he envisages the Hindu Gods and Goddesses. There is no quarrel had he painted a nude woman sitting on the tail of a monkey. The point is he captioned it as Sita. Nobody would have protested against the sexual perversion and his orientatation to sexual signs and symbols. But would he dare to caption it as 'Fatima enjoying in Jannat with animals'?

Next example-is the painting of Saraswati copulating with a lion. Here again his perversion is evident and so is his intent. Even that lets concede cannot be faulted-each one's sexual orientation is each one's business I suppose. But he captioned it as Saraswati. This is the problem. It is Hussain's business to enjoy in painting his sexual perversion. But why use Saraswati and Sita for his perverted expressions? Use Fatima and watch the consequence. Let the media people come to his rescue then. Now that he is in a country that gives him complete freedom let him go ahead and paint Fatima copulating with a lion or any other animal of his choice. And then turn around and prove to India-the Freedom of expression he enjoys in Qatar.

Talking about Freedom of Expression-this is the Hussain who supported Emergency-painted Indira Gandhi as Durga slaying Jayaprakas Narayan. He supported the jailing of artists and writers. Where did this Freedom of Expression go? And you call him secularist? Would you support the jailing of artists and writers Ram –would you support the abeyance of the Constitution and all that we held sacred in democracy and the excessiveness of Indira Gandhi to gag the media-writers- political opponents? Tell me honesty why does Hussain expect this Freedom when he himself did not support others with the same freedom he wants? And the media has rushed to his rescue. Had it been a Ram who painted such obnoxious, .degrading painting-the reactions of the media and the elite 'secularists' would have been different; because there is a different perception/and index of secularism when it comes to Ram-and a different perception/and index of secularism when it comes to Rahim/Hussain.

It brings back to my mind an episode that happened to The Hindu some years ago.[1991]. You had a separate weekly page for children with cartoons, quizzes, and with poems and articles of school children. In one such weekly page The Hindu printed a venerable bearded man-fully robed with head dress, mouthing some passages of the Koran-trying to teach children .It was done not only in good faith but as a part of inculcating values to children from the Koran. All hell broke loose. Your office witnessed goons who rushed in-demanded an apology-held out threats. In Ambur,Vaniambadi and Vellore the papers stands were burned-the copies of The Hindu were consigned to the fire. A threat to raise the issue in Parliament through a Private Members Bill was held out-Hectic activities went on-I am not sure of the nature and the machinations behind the scene. But The Hindu next day brought out a public apology in its front page. Where were you Ram? How secular and tolerant were the Muslims?

Well this is of the past-today it is worse because the communal temperature in this country is at a all high-even a small friction can ignite and demolition the country's peace and harmony. It is against this background that one should view Hussain who is bent on abusing and insulting the Hindu Gods and Goddesses. Respect for religious sentiments, need to maintain peace and harmony should also be part of the agenda of an artist-if he is great. If it is absent then he cannot say that he respects India and express his longing for India.

Let's face it-he is a fugitive of law. Age and religion are immaterial. What does the media want-that he be absolved by the courts? Even for that he has to appear in the courts-he cannot run away-After all this is the country where he lived and gave expression to his pervert sadist, erotic artistic mind under Freedom of Expression. I simply cannot jump into the bandwagon of the elite 'secularist' and uphold what he had done. With his brush he had committed jihad-bloodletting.

The issue is just not nudity-Yes the temples-the frescos in Konarak and Kajhuraho have nude figures-But does it say that they are Sita, Sarswati or any goddesses? We have the Yoni and the Phallus as sacred signs of Life-of Siva and Shakthi-take these icons to the streets, paint them -give it a caption it become vulgar. Times have changed. Even granted that our ancients sculptured and painted naked forms and figures, with a pervert mind to demean religion is no license to repeat that in today's changed political and social scenario and is not a sign of secularism and tolerance. I repeat there is no quarrel with nudity-painters have time and again found in it the perfection of God's hand craft.

Let me wish Hussain peace in Qatar-the totalitarian regime with zero tolerance May be he will convince the regime there to permit freedom of expression in word, writing and painting. For this he could start experimenting painting forms and figure of Mohamed the Prophet-and his family And may I fervently wish that the media-especially The Hindu does not discriminate goons-let it not substitute tolerance for intolerance when it comes to Rahim and Antony and another index for Ram.

I hope you will read this in the same spirit that I have written. All the best to you Ram.



Dr Mrs Hilda Raja, Vadodara

Brilliant POST !.

I would accept Pseudo Secularism of Bharka Dutt, Parnnoy Roy, Rajdeep Sardesai or Vir Sanghvi BUT not from a so called intellectual newspaper known for an unbiased view point.

It is well known that N.Ram is a Communist. His personal life is also well documented. But this is letter gives a FANTASTIC SLAP on the editorial of THE HINDU.

Even if you look at the origin of the Kazhagams in India the real culprit is not MuKA or others but it is none other than the last Governor General of India Mr.Rajaji. He was the one who split from INC and gave way for the Kazhagams to take over power in Tamil Nadu. This Rajaji was an avid supporter of this newspaper.

Even in the current situation when the whole world is looking at the videos of Swami Nityananda and his movie star friends there is no wide spread reporting of the scandal which has happened in Kerala. I'm not defending the Nitts, but what he did in his private room is his private matter just like Tiger Woods and also Prof.Ramachandara of Aligarh Muslim University. But when they take a public image of Mr.Clean and make tonnes of money out of it and do all this in privacy the double standards is being exposed. The public have done the right thing of thrashing their ashrams and burning their property in Nitts case.

But in Fr.Thomas case where two kids were posioned after being molested by this 63 year old Priest, one kid died and when the other girl protested the Sister responsible for the orphanage they were threatened and physically abused. The very persons who should exposed the bad ways of the Priest of Church who has taken the word of celibacy has molested a 14 year old kid and then killed her.The church is trying to protect this individual and cover up the case. Either if the church had handed over this Father to police or the public would have gone irate like the Nitts case it would have been fair. But what do you do when the Vote Bank is involved and hence any abuse which will affect the minority vote bank is covered by the persons, organization, police, government and the Pseudo Secular Media.

So Much for Pseudo Secularism in India and which will arrive shortly on Canadian Shores.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sunny Leone a true Canadian DESI now back in India !.

Just curious - was the letter published in THE HINDU?


Would you have any reference to the date on which it was published?

Is it not the same Ram who scuttled the hard work of Chitra Subramaniam who exposed the Bofors case and got the culprits?

My questions to MFH and his supporters who want him to come back to India

- Is MFH equally comfortable depicting Muslim or Christian characters in the same way he has depicted Hindu characters?

- What are his views on the Danish cartoons? Shouldn't he condemn the people who oppose the cartoonist's freedom of expression?

KumarM: No it was NOT N. Ram who scuttled the efforts by Chitra Subramaniam in the Bofors case. G. Kasturi was the editor of THE HINDU, at that time. Reportedly, he got a call from the PMO'S office asking him to stop publishing scoops about the Bofors scandal.


Kasturi relented and instead the Indian Express under the great Ramnath Goenka published the stories by Chitra Subramaniam.


MF Hussain should be ashamed of his paintings. Depicting Hindu Gods in the nude is not art. Those defending him are guilty of double standards - but you know it is OK in India, to be that way.

Thank you Nightmare for uploading this article.

It is a must read by all members of CD.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Best regards

Lali