Posted on: 22-07-06 01:41:35
The people of the land were greatly devoted to God. They did not have any greed to accumulate wealth. They were not envious of others and always spoke the truth. There was hardly any child mortality and people lived a long and healthy life. There was always good harvest from agriculture. The empire was defended by great warriors. This country did exist in our sub continent 1000s of years ago and was dreamt of by Gandhiji, but its name will always be bane for our pseudo secularists and 5 star activists. However, during these turbulent times, is it nor worthwhile to remind ourselves as to how an ideal state should be?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally posted by ramar2005
However, during these turbulent times, is it nor worthwhile to remind ourselves as to how an ideal state should be?
Yep full of Ideal citizens. Lets start defining what that 'ideal' citizen should do think and feel
. I'll make it happen with my 800 trillion$.
BTW: I think this term 'pseudo secularist' is unique to Indian politics. What exactly is it? Who is a 'real' secularist and is 'secular' a good thing for India? OR Is 'secular' good only when one is living as a minority in a 'secular' country as many of our NRI's in the west do? Do they similarly support changing of thier 'secular' new homes to 'Christian' countries and call the 'secular' populace 'pseudo-secularists'? So many questions...I dont think I'll get many answers
.p.s: I already think we are living in an ideal world
...its a work in progress though.-----------------------------------------------------------------
Recommended Services- Servicedomino.com
http://www.servicedomino.com
If a person cites the Gujarat riots to Godhra carnage he is communal. If the same person attributes the terrorism on Mumbai to Ayodhya problem, he can become secular
-----------------------------------------------------------------
